OSPF is a good way. Kevin Myers has a post about using ospf, ECMP, and clans for unequal load balancing. https://www.stubarea51.net/2016/10/27/wisp-design-using-ospf-to-build-a-transit-fabric-over-unequal-links/
Justin Wilson j...@mtin.net www.mtin.net www.midwest-ix.com > On Dec 21, 2018, at 1:57 PM, Dennis Burgess via Mikrotik-users > <mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote: > > Yep that would be the correct setup in this instance. > > > Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer > Author of "Learn RouterOS- Second Edition" > Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services > Office: 314-735-0270 Website: http://www.linktechs.net > Create Wireless Coverage's with www.towercoverage.com > > -----Original Message----- > From: mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org <mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org> On > Behalf Of Nick Bright via Mikrotik-users > Sent: Friday, December 21, 2018 12:56 PM > To: Mikrotik Users <mikrotik-users@wispa.org> > Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] Bonding for availability > > Thanks all, I will look at doing this with OSPF. > > On 12/21/2018 11:43 AM, Robert Nickerson wrote: >> We use OSPF for a setup of this type. It seems to work well. >> >> Thx >> >> RAN >> >> On 12/20/2018 3:43 PM, Nick Bright via Mikrotik-users wrote: >>> Greetings, >>> >>> I'm looking at a configuration to set up bonding between two Mikrotik >>> routers (CCR1009 and RB2011), using two separate wireless links >>> between them (external radios). >>> >>> I am concerned about one of the links having an issue where it stays >>> linked, but stops passing traffic. >>> >>> Which bonding driver would be best suited to providing maximum >>> availability? Bonded capacity is not required, but the links aren't >>> the same speed; so I'd want to prefer the faster link if >>> non-aggregated capacity is required. >>> >>> It seems like any method which only supports MII monitoring is out, >>> because the MII link wouldn't drop (it's Ethernet to the radio); >>> which rules out 802.11ad, active-backup, and balance-tlb. >>> >>> broadcast seems like it would be limited to the slower link, rather >>> than the faster link. >>> >>> balance-rr states that it requires equal bandwidth links. >>> >>> This appears to only leave balance-xor and balance-alb. It seems like >>> balance-alb is most likely the best choice. >>> >>> I am also unclear on how the ARP availability mechanism judges a port >>> to be available. I think that I would want to assign a unique probing >>> address to each port on each end of each router, and have those IP >>> addresses (one per port) set in the arp-ip-targets list? This should >>> allow the router to know which specific ports work, and which don't? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> > > -- > ----------------------------------------------- > - Nick Bright - > - Vice President of Technology - > - Valnet -=- We Connect You -=- - > - Tel 888-332-1616 x 315 / Fax 620-331-0789 - > - Web http://www.valnet.net/ - > ----------------------------------------------- > - Are your files safe? - > - Valnet Vault - Secure Cloud Backup - > - More information & 30 day free trial at - > - http://www.valnet.net/services/valnet-vault - > ----------------------------------------------- > > _______________________________________________ > Mikrotik-users mailing list > Mikrotik-users@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users > _______________________________________________ > Mikrotik-users mailing list > Mikrotik-users@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users >
_______________________________________________ Mikrotik-users mailing list Mikrotik-users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
