On 01/20/2011 02:54 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
Well crap... There goes that plan then.. :/
Any other suggestions I may try? I was hoping by at least catching *a*
packet/connection that could be identified as P2P and shoving their IP into
an address list I could limit the number of concurrent connections - thereby
reducing the traffic that I couldn't identify..
Both systems are beefy enough IMO, but neither liked those three rules being
active once I hit about 50Mb/s aggregate.
For what it's worth, the metric that is at issue is not bandwidth, but
packet rate. Just adding this for clarity in the archives.
--
********************************************************************
* Butch Evans * Professional Network Consultation*
* http://www.butchevans.com/ * Network Engineering *
* http://store.wispgear.net/ * Wired or Wireless Networks *
* http://blog.butchevans.com/ * ImageStream, Mikrotik and MORE! *
* NOTE THE NEW PHONE NUMBER: 702-537-0979 *
********************************************************************
_______________________________________________
Mikrotik mailing list
Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com
http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS
