Well they have routers, but both networks ( 10.5.50.x & 192.168.x.x ) will run 
over the bridged wireless network. So there really is two wireless networks in 
the air, put a switch in the middle and the wireless networks will see each 
others traffic.

But when both wireless networks are connected through the switch, the 
non-Mikrotik network gets captured by the Mikrotik box. Even though the 
192.168.x.x network is vpn from client to router, encapsulated.

Actually do binding for devices in the dhcp server, I just want the hotspot to 
ignore and 192.168.x.x ip address traffic at all and go about it's original 
path.

---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
Reply-To: Mikrotik discussions <mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com>
Date:  Thu, 27 Jan 2011 19:12:34 -0500

>It looks like both Wan interfaces have privates?  Weird.
>
>If you have a mt hotspot you can do a binding for an entire range of IPs if
>that helps.  I know I'm still confused on what devices and  subnets there
>are.
>On Jan 27, 2011 7:08 PM, "Scott Reed" <sr...@nwwnet.net> wrote:
>> I am still confused. How are you getting 192.168.x.x addresses on the
>> TW Internet?
>>
>> On 1/27/2011 6:19 PM, Stuart Pierce wrote:
>>> Ok
>>>
>>> Network 1 - 10.5.50.x
>>> V
>>> Frontier DSL Internet
>>> V
>>> Mikrotik hotspot
>>> V
>>> wireless network/cloud
>>> V
>>> Netgear Switch
>>> V
>>> wireless network/cloud
>>> ^
>>> Cisco VPN
>>> ^
>>> Time Warner Internet
>>> ^
>>> Network 2 - 192.168.x.x
>>>
>>> If you took out the Netgear switch the two networks wouldn't see each
>other. Network 2 is supposedly all VPN. We put both networks in the switch
>and Network 2 clients ( all of them I suppose ) start to get the Mikrotik
>hotspot login or are captured by the mikrotik box.
>>>
>>> I was really hoping that network 2 being vpn based wouldn't be captured
>by the mikrotik hotspot. So I was thinking of a firewall rule to tell the
>mikrotik box to just disregard any network of 192.168.x.x
>>>
>>> ---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
>>> From: Josh Luthman<j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
>>> Reply-To: Mikrotik discussions<mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com>
>>> Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 16:21:13 -0500
>>>
>>>> I know I'm really lost and I would need to see a much better network
>>>> diagram.
>>>>
>>>> Josh Luthman
>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>> Suite 1337
>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Stuart Pierce<spie...@avolve.net>
>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Got this situation:
>>>>>
>>>>> Network 1 Network 2
>>>>> Internet tik-hotspot - wireless - vpn-network - Internet
>>>>>
>>>>> Network 1 is the usual 10.5.50.x
>>>>> Network 2 is 192.168.x.x
>>>>>
>>>>> Want to run both networks on the same equipment at the wireless
>juncture,
>>>>> each having their own gateways. Thinking the VPN network would not be
>>>>> captured by the tik-hotspot once the join is complete at the switch at
>the
>>>>> wireless juncture, but the VPN network is captured by the tik-hotspot.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is there a way to make this work by telling the tik-hotspot to
>disregard
>>>>> any traffic from the 192.168.x.x network so that that network just
>flows to
>>>>> it's original intended gateway ?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ________________________________________________________________
>>>>> Sent via the WebMail system at avolve.net
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Mikrotik mailing list
>>>>> Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com
>>>>> http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
>>>>>
>>>>> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik
>>>>> RouterOS
>>>>>
>>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>>> URL:<
>http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20110127/c8eb441e/attachment.html
>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Mikrotik mailing list
>>>> Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com
>>>> http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
>>>>
>>>> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik
>RouterOS
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ________________________________________________________________
>>> Sent via the WebMail system at avolve.net
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Mikrotik mailing list
>>> Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com
>>> http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
>>>
>>> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik
>RouterOS
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Scott Reed
>> Owner
>> NewWays Networking, LLC
>> Wireless Networking
>> Network Design, Installation and Administration
>> Mikrotik Advanced Certified
>> www.nwwnet.net
>> (765) 855-1060
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mikrotik mailing list
>> Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com
>> http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
>>
>> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik
>RouterOS
>-------------- next part --------------
>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>URL: 
><http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20110127/29775fbc/attachment.html>
>_______________________________________________
>Mikrotik mailing list
>Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com
>http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
>
>Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS
>
 




________________________________________________________________
Sent via the WebMail system at avolve.net


 
                   
_______________________________________________
Mikrotik mailing list
Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com
http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik

Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS

Reply via email to