-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 131 of them here, but this got me to looking at the info on them and it's interesting the decrease in performance on the GL.. Like they were seeing a bunch of failures at 680Mhz? or it was attacking another product's sales? Is there an official reason for the GL?
> http://www.roc-noc.com/mikrotik/routerboard/rb750g.html On 06/01/2011 07:57 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: > Looks like it on routerboard.com =( > > http://gregsowell.com/?p=2974 > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20110601/4b8171ca/attachment.html> > _______________________________________________ > Mikrotik mailing list > Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com > http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik > > Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJN5xTFAAoJEC+8HUjSuDOs9CwH+gJ0Ok65IjjF7r9itKWglaW/ 8ufmLWI8CuJwp2wwgKnI2UVOpZ04TRo8L+7wShqJC5MVRZQv4kT2kUYu5KAZm4k2 FGPzA2XcO3XEp3gFmcslOXuyosa+Lp3CBqraZf2sfoiaULkuOJ2TWVTv9PkS/oke ODOCLroso+8G7Xo+JXGfrHwpXukzJfeSr7qiHEE1MYc6WRmvqdLt/HdX0Uoy7+hO X2FUCn+dOvfeNKvGqKplWNY+rRJS0gWWAb56ntHOK/ECATadMgY/PQoCjHHb3Cw4 XQgaf6+LotjLVKZRnzH6HXRZyyrCjuAXpRoY3KIDg0sOfaz68MVUX5aTVgdtos0= =cZjZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Mikrotik mailing list Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS
