Can the MT ping a host in 72 and 1? What happens when you traceroute out from 72 or 1 to one another?
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Rory McCann <rmm.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > Essentially, neither are talking to each other in any way, shape or form. > > I'm working on it remotely but the only device that can talk to both > subnets is the mikrotik that is on site. Due to cabling restrictions I had > to run the .72.x subnet on the same layer 2 network as the existing .1.x > subnet. I have PPTP remote access set up and working. I am trying to get the > PPTP client to talk to the devices on the .72.x subnet and it doesn't want > to work. I can talk to the .1.x subnet just fine. > > I RDP'd into a server on the network and it also cannot talk to the 72.x > subnet, so I'm assuming there's a route that isn't getting distributed > properly or something funky. As I understand it, when a TCP/IP device does > not know the location of something, it forwards the request upstream for > answers. Since all devices on the network have the same upstream router (the > mikrotik) which already created the necessary routes dynamically for me, I > am assuming no further static routes would be necessary. Is this the correct > assumption? > > > > Rory McCann > *Minn-Kota Ag Products > P*: 701-403-4877*| E*: r...@mkap.com > > On 8/15/2011 3:58 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: > >> What isn't talking to what? If the 72 machines can't talk to the 1 >> machines >> it may be because they're routing to a different router and the Mikrotik >> isn't sharing the subnets. >> >> Can a PC ping both 192.168.1.1 and 192.168.72.1 (or whatever IPs are on >> the >> MT)? >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 4:55 PM, Scott Reed<sr...@nwwnet.net> wrote: >> >> Put the addresses on the bridge, not the ports. >>> I have as many as 4 subnets on a an interface. Should work the same for >>> a >>> bridge. >>> >>> >>> On 8/15/2011 4:37 PM, Rory McCann wrote: >>> >>> Is there some kind of limitation in ROS that prevents two subnets on the >>>> same interface from working properly? I have a 192.168.1.0/24 subnet >>>> and >>>> a 192.168.72.0/24 subnet on the same interface (it's actually a bridge >>>> of >>>> 3 ports) and for the life of me I cannot get them to talk to each other. >>>> >>>> Everything on the .72 subnet is static and the .1 subnet is assigned via >>>> DHCP by a Window Server. Am I better off moving .72 on to its own >>>> interface >>>> and tying it back into the switch from there or am I missing something >>>> basic? >>>> >>>> -- >>> Scott Reed >>> Owner >>> NewWays Networking, LLC >>> Wireless Networking >>> Network Design, Installation and Administration >>> >>> >>> >>> Mikrotik Advanced Certified >>> >>> www.nwwnet.net >>> (765) 855-1060 >>> (765) 439-4253 >>> (855) 231-6239 >>> >>> >>> >>> ______________________________****_________________ >>> Mikrotik mailing list >>> Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com >>> http://www.butchevans.com/****mailman/listinfo/mikrotik<http://www.butchevans.com/**mailman/listinfo/mikrotik> >>> <http**://www.butchevans.com/mailman/**listinfo/mikrotik<http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik> >>> > >>> >>> >>> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik >>> RouterOS >>> >>> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL:<http://www.butchevans.**com/pipermail/mikrotik/** >> attachments/20110815/ef2aaa01/**attachment.html<http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20110815/ef2aaa01/attachment.html> >> > >> >> ______________________________**_________________ >> Mikrotik mailing list >> Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com >> http://www.butchevans.com/**mailman/listinfo/mikrotik<http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik> >> >> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik >> RouterOS >> > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: <http://www.butchevans.com/**pipermail/mikrotik/** > attachments/20110815/a47e39cc/**attachment.html<http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20110815/a47e39cc/attachment.html> > > > > ______________________________**_________________ > Mikrotik mailing list > Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com > http://www.butchevans.com/**mailman/listinfo/mikrotik<http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik> > > Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik > RouterOS > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20110815/6c952343/attachment.html> _______________________________________________ Mikrotik mailing list Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS
