On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 7:53 PM, Oleg Kalnichevski <[email protected]> wrote: > Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: >> >> (i hope to do a proper review of the releases tomorrow) >> >> On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Markus Wiederkehr >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Oleg Kalnichevski <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Folks >>>> >>>> Please do take a few minutes to review the release notes, packages and >>>> the updated web site for the upcoming 0.6 release. >>>> >>>> Release notes: >>>> http://people.apache.org/~olegk/mime4j-0.6-preview/RELEASE_NOTES.txt >>> >>> I wonder if we should include any or all of the older notes from 0.4 and >>> 0.5: >>> >>> * Mime4j API is still considered unstable and is likely to change in >>> future releases >>> * DOM support has known limitations and some roundtrip issues remain >>> to be resolved >>> * Some low level functions are available only in the pull parser >>> (recommended for >>> advanced users) >>> >>> I would opt for numbers 1 and 3; >> >> +1 >> >>> number 2 should have been resolved >>> sufficiently in the course of MIME4J-34.. >> >> probably worth saying something about 2, maybe >> >> "The DOM API has been now been comprehensively refactored and the >> known limitations addressed. Please report any remaining issues to >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J."; >> >> we should probably add something about the known limitations of some >> of the field parsing code, maybe something like >> >> "0.6 contains a mixture of approaches to the parsing of advanced MIME >> field types. Limitations are known with these approaches with some >> relatively uncommon use cases. A consistent and comprehensive rewrite >> is planned for 0.7 which should consolidate and address these." >> >> - robert > > > Markus, Robert > > Sounds very reasonable. There is no need for a complex protocol. Just go > ahead and apply changes that you deem necessary.
I wonder if the information in BUILDING.txt is still up to date? Is maven version 2.0.6 still sufficient? And for me "mvn package" always did the job; no -U, no -Plocal.. Markus
