[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Oleg Kalnichevski resolved MIME4J-192.
--------------------------------------
Resolution: Not A Problem
My _ONLY_ real complaint was about you not bringing your refactoring work to a
logical conclusion of some sort.
Oleg
> setFlatMode and setContentDecoding are not exposed by the MessageBuilder
> interface
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MIME4J-192
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-192
> Project: JAMES Mime4j
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: dom
> Affects Versions: 0.7
> Reporter: Stefano Bagnara
> Fix For: 0.7
>
>
> Here is jDKIM use case:
> ----
> public Message(InputStream is) throws IOException, MimeException {
> MessageBuilder mb = newMessageBuilder();
>
> if (mb instanceof MessageBuilderImpl) {
> ((MessageBuilderImpl) mb).setFlatMode(true);
> ((MessageBuilderImpl) mb).setContentDecoding(false);
> }
> org.apache.james.mime4j.dom.Message mImpl = mb.parse(new
> EOLConvertingInputStream(is));
>
> this.message = mImpl;
> }
> ----
> Is this the expected client pattern? Or should we expose setFlatMode and
> setContentDecoding in the MessageBuilder interface so to remove the class
> casting requirement?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
