[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-193?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13051247#comment-13051247
]
Norman Maurer commented on MIME4J-193:
--------------------------------------
I'm not that deep in the code-base (yet) but I think we should remove
MimeWriter or MessageFormatterImpl if both have the same methods and does the
same. Duplicate code is not that nice ;)
> Being able to write a message using dom api with no dependencies on the
> message package
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MIME4J-193
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-193
> Project: JAMES Mime4j
> Issue Type: Wish
> Components: dom
> Affects Versions: 0.7
> Reporter: Stefano Bagnara
> Fix For: 0.8
>
>
> While refactoring jDKIM against the latest mime4j trunk I found that the code
> now depends on "message" package because of MimeWriter.DEFAULT.writeTo calls.
> At the same time I see we now have MessageServiceFactory.newMessageFormatter
> and MessageFormatter interface that expose a writeTo(Message, OutputStream)
> method: why don't we expose all of the other writeTo methods from MimeWriter,
> too? (and maybe MimeWriter should implement MessageFormatter so we don't need
> the MessageFormatterImpl class at all)
> WDYT?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
