2011/7/20 Norman Maurer <[email protected]>: > So should I reroll later ?
Yes, please! Stefano > Bye, > Norman > > Am 20.07.2011 13:07, schrieb Stefano Bagnara: >> >> 2011/7/20 Stefano Bagnara<[email protected]>: >>> >>> The binary package only includes jars for "core" and not other jars. >>> >>> Then I see there are 2 source releases, too. >> >> removed the src package defined in the assembly module because apache >> parent pom now defines a source release package when the >> "apache-release" profile is enabled (and it is, during release). >> renamed LICENSE/NOTICE to remove .txt so that the above assembly will >> take our NOTICE/LICENSE instead of the defaults. >> changed the bin.xml assembly to make sure it includes all of our >> modules (previously it included only core). >> >> Hope this is OK now. >> >> Stefano >> >>> I'll try to have a look at both, soon, so maybe we can reroll it. >>> >>> Stefano >>> >>> PS: sorry Norman, I should have tested "mvn package" before asking you >>> to release. >>> >>> 2011/7/20 Norman Maurer<[email protected]>: >>>> >>>> Hi there, >>>> >>>> its time again for a new Apache James Mime4j release a.k.a 0.7. This >>>> release contains a lot of bug fixes and improvements. >>>> For a list of changes see: >>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310521&version=12313592 >>>> >>>> Please review the artifacts: >>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejames-007/ >>>> >>>> [ ] +1 Yes, please release >>>> [ ] +0 No time to review >>>> [ ] -1 Something wrong with it >>>> >>>> Bye, >>>> Norman >>>> >>>> > >
