On Fri, 2013-07-26 at 12:13 +0100, Eric Charles wrote: > Is latest trunk stable enough to cut a release? >
No, it is not. Oleg > I can act as release manager, but I need third party eyes to validate > current trunk. > > Thx, Eric > > On 26/07/2013 11:44, Oleg Kalnichevski wrote: > > On Fri, 2013-07-26 at 10:19 +0200, Igor Bogomolov wrote: > >> Oleg, > >> > >> Thank you for your reply! > >> > >>> ... merging > >>> MboxIterator down to the stable (0.7) branch and releasing it with the > >>> next patch release (0.7.3). > >> > >> Would be great! Especially if "nobody is working on it right now", it > >> will be the only release with MboxIterator for a while. > >> > > > > The bad news is I am having my hands full with upcoming releases of > > HttpClient and will not be able to act as a release manager for mime4j. > > Some one else would need to step in. > > > > Oleg > > > >> Igor > >> > >> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Oleg Kalnichevski <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>> On Wed, 2013-07-24 at 17:58 +0200, Igor Bogomolov wrote: > >>>> Dear Mime4j developers, > >>>> > >>>> I am using Mime4j in my open source project. I am especially happy > >>>> with MboxIterator as I need to parse .mbox files. But currently it is > >>>> only available in 0.8.0-SNAPSHOT version that is not in the Maven > >>>> Central Repository. When are you planing to make 0.8.0 release? Or > >>>> where can I get built version of 0.8.0-SNAPSHOT? > >>>> > >>>> I know I can build it myself but I would like to point to built > >>>> version other people who would like to use my project. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> Igor > >>> > >>> Igor > >>> > >>> Since no one else responded here is my take on it. I am afraid Mime4j > >>> 0.8 will not be release ready any time soon especially given nobody is > >>> working on it right now. > >>> > >>> We could consider bending the release rules, though, by c > >>> > >>> Oleg > >>> > > > >
