[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13988660#comment-13988660
]
Oleg Kalnichevski commented on MIME4J-238:
------------------------------------------
Howard,
Is it really good idea to push weirdness from some application into what is
meant to be a generic, general purpose library? Even if your application uses
some custom content type, why is it such a problem to make that custom type to
use 'multipart' mime type?
{noformat}
Content-Type: multipart/x-my-weird-application;
boundary="Part_8_5123801.1399049231138"
{noformat}
or
{noformat}
Content-Type: x-multipart/my-weird-application;
boundary="Part_8_5123801.1399049231138"
{noformat}
Oleg
> Add custom mimetype with multipart support
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MIME4J-238
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-238
> Project: James Mime4j
> Issue Type: Wish
> Affects Versions: 0.8.0
> Reporter: Howard Nguyen
>
> Add custom mimetype with multipart support is basically not only mime type
> that start with "multipart/" signaling multipart. Of course, the Content-Type
> would still have "boundary" parameter. For example:
> {code}
> Content-Type: x-my-weird-application; boundary="Part_8_5123801.1399049231138"
> {code}
> You do this check in MimeUtil.isMultipart method.
> Is it possible to pass an interface MultipartChecker to through MimeConfig to
> MimeEntity so that in the following method so that we use it instead of
> MimeUtil
> {code}
> public EntityStateMachine advance() throws IOException, MimeException {
> ...
> case T_END_HEADER:
> ...
> } else if (MimeUtil.isMultipart(mimeType)) {
> state = EntityState.T_START_MULTIPART;
> clearMimePartStream();
> }
> ...
> }
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
