Hi Philip,
Thanks for your reply. >> As I proposed on the server-dev list, I propose that we promote this project >> to version 1.0.0. > Bear in mind that your package reorganisation would likely be a substantial > breaking change if it went ahead. I shot out 3 messages simultaneously, so I suppose this comment is related to the topic "Re: public vs. private packages”? Yes, I agree with your statement. However, note that according to semantic versioning, anything <1 is subject to change, as it is still in “beta”. (But that does not reduce your statement, and the fact that it would be a burden for others to update form the current version to version 1.0.0.) To keep the topics separate, I’ll say no more here regarding the proposed changes, and leave this thread only about the version bump. Cheers, =David
