Quoting "David F. Skoll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Thu, 25 Sep 2003, James Ralston wrote: > > > David Skoll: > > > ... if any *_contains_virus function says there's a > > > virus, the action_notify_sender routine will fail with a nasty log > > > message. > > > That strikes be as being perfectly reasonable. > > > However (in case you are considering it), I would argue that calling > > action_bounce() after a message tests positive for a virus is a > > reasonable thing to do. > > Right. I won't be adding an interlock between virus detection and > action_bounce. >
What about if I don't want to bounce the message, but just drop the infected file + notify sender (only if it's local sender) what happened? I think there shoult be option to do that. Can I enable back action_notify_sender routine even if a virus was detected? Thank you, Dmitry _______________________________________________ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca MIMEDefang mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
