This will (again) break any sendmail-based defense against unresolvable sender domains. I have greylisting in place, and my BIND is configured with the latest delegation-related directives, but would it be something to consider, to have MIMEDefang reject a message if the domainname of the sender resolves to VeriSign's search site? (This would help people who dont do greylisting and/or dont control their DNS server's configuration.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A25819-2004Feb9.html KEN CORMACK, RHCE Sr. UNIX Systems Analyst, Open Systems Group Sr. Software Analyst, TSG Midrange Systems Group AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERVICES, INC. 557 E. Tallmadge Ave., Akron, OH 44310 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (330) 643-6372 Fax: (330) 643-6367 Pager: (800) 946-4646 Pin 1412819 "If that that is 'is' is that that is not 'not is', is that that is 'not is' that that is not 'is'? It is!" - Ken Cormack "Sendmail administration is not black magic. There are legitimate technical reasons why it requires the sacrificing of a live chicken." - Unknown _______________________________________________ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca MIMEDefang mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
