I had the following sendmail LOCAL_RULESET. I just need to add an access
check to it. When turned off this rule, the domain literal worked fine...
dnl # Check HTo: to verify user or alias exists
dnl # What about BCC? Also, what about mailer tabled domains?
dnl # Must not be blank
dnl # Allow To: username only from localhost (for emailed log files)
dnl HTo: $>CheckTo
dnl
dnl SCheckTo
dnl R$* ( $* ) $* $: $1
dnl R$* < $* > $* $: $2
dnl R$* $: <$1>
dnl R<$+ @ $+ . $-> $: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dnl R<$+> $: <$1> <$&{client_name}>
dnl R<$+> < localhost > $@ OK
dnl #R<$+> <$+> $: <$1> <$2 . $m>
dnl #R<$+> < $j > $@ OK
dnl R<$+> <$*> $: <$1>
dnl R<$+> $#error $: "553 Delivery blocked; HTo: specified an
invalid address"
dnl R<$@> $#error $: "553 Delivery blocked; HTo: specified a
null address"
KEN CORMACK, RHCE
Sr. UNIX Systems Analyst,
Open Systems Group
Sr. Software Analyst,
TSG Midrange Systems Group
AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERVICES, INC.
557 E. Tallmadge Ave., Akron, OH 44310
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (330) 643-6372
Fax: (330) 643-6367
Pager: (800) 946-4646 Pin 1412819
"If that that is 'is' is that that is not 'not is', is that that is 'not is'
that that is not 'is'? It is!" - Ken Cormack
"Sendmail administration is not black magic. There are legitimate technical
reasons why it requires the sacrificing of a live chicken." - Unknown
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Cormack, Ken
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 11:08 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [Mimedefang] OT - Cant figure out why this is being
rejected
Sendmail knows itself as follows, on my box...
============ SYSTEM IDENTITY (after readcf) ============
(short domain name) $w = mail01
As you can see, it properly knows it's own short-name. I defind class w in
the file "Fw /etc/mail/local-host-names". In that file, I already have the
IP address listed. This is driving me nuts! Everywhere that I'm supposed
to have the IP listed, it's listed. But keep the suggestions coming!
Doubtless, we'll find it! LOL
Ken
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jon R.
Kibler
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 10:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Mimedefang] OT - Cant figure out why this is being
rejected
"Cormack, Ken" wrote:
>
> This is most likely off-topic, and for that I appologize. I'm trying to
> figure out why my mail servers are rejecting mail addressed to domain
> literals such as "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" with a "550 5.7.1 Relaying
> denied" error. I dont see anything in my MIMEDefang config that would be
> doing this, and I'm stuck as to what might be causing it. Anyone have any
> thoughts? My sendmail is 8.12.11. Thanks all, in advance.
>
Is [98.83.130.15] a local host? To check:
/usr/lib/sendmail -bt
$=w
If you don't see it there, that's your problem!
How to fix it? Could be complicated -- depending upon your system's network
configuration. If you still have questions, contact me off-list and include
the results of your $=w and an ifconfig -a on that box.
Jon
--
Jon R. Kibler
Chief Technical Officer
A.S.E.T., Inc.
Charleston, SC USA
(843) 849-8214
==================================================
Filtered by: TRUSTEM.COM's Email Filtering Service
http://www.trustem.com/
No Spam. No Viruses. Just Good Clean Email.
_______________________________________________
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca
MIMEDefang mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
_______________________________________________
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca
MIMEDefang mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
