On Tue, 2004-03-23 at 09:22, Gwendolynn ferch Elydyr wrote: > Hola! > > I'm testing a mimedefang2.39/spamassassin2.63 combnation for catching > spam, which was working nicely last week - catching the vast majority > of spam, and otherwise behaving as desired. > > Now, I'm suddenly getting results like 11 out of 207 messages which are > clearly spam[0] being caught. > > I'm more than a bit disconcerted by this sudden change in performance. To > the best of my knowledge, nothing in the configuration has changed > between this week and last week - and all of the messages are being > seen by spamassassin. > > The one change that has been made on this system is the addition of > puremessage - but it claims that it installs into its own tree, without > affecting your existing SA installation [if anybody can verify this, it'd > be apprepciated] >
A couple of things.. is puremessage being run as a milter? Is it running before or after mimedefang? -- Stephen John Smoogen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Los Alamos National Lab CCN-5 Sched 5/40 PH: 4-0645 Ta-03 SM-1498 MailStop B255 DP 10S Los Alamos, NM 87545 -- So shines a good deed in a weary world. = Willy Wonka -- _______________________________________________ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca MIMEDefang mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang