Sent spam filled message via sendmail CL from an external machine and it got filtered and discarded as expected.
# sent via telnet + CL sendmail to local machine
May 4 14:01:40 whiskey sendmail[18754]: i44L0l8T018754: [EMAIL PROTECTED], size=101, class=0, nrcpts=1, >msgid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, proto=SMTP, daemon=MTA, relay=wasabi.lmi.net [66.117.155.2]
May 4 14:01:40 whiskey mimedefang.pl[865]: MDLOG,i44L0l8T018754,spam,7.066,66.117.155.2,[EMAIL PROTECTED],bfriedman,
May 4 14:01:40 whiskey mimedefang.pl[865]: filter: i44L0l8T018754: discard=1 quarantine_entire_message=1
May 4 14:01:40 whiskey mimedefang[18755]: i44L0l8T018754: Discarding because filter instructed us to
May 4 14:01:40 whiskey sendmail[18754]: i44L0l8T018754: Milter: data, discard
May 4 14:01:40 whiskey sendmail[18754]: i44L0l8T018754: discarded
...........
Sent same message via yahoo pop account to same sendmail machine and it got filtered but not discarded. I replicated this several times. The message is always filtered and discarded if I send via telnet CL either locally or remotely. I noticed that in the first "CL" instance the the msgid included my gateway while in the second "POP" instance" it included the initial mail gateway. But, in either case it's forwarding this message to an external user aliased from a local user.
...................
# sent via POP to same machine
May 4 15:25:01 whiskey sendmail[18935]: i44MP1W0018935: from=, size=811, class=0, nrcpts=1, >msgid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, proto=SMTP, daemon=MTA, relay=web80501.mail.yahoo.com [66.218.79.71]
May 4 15:25:01 whiskey sendmail[18935]: i44MP1W0018935: Milter add: header: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.42
May 4 15:25:08 whiskey sendmail[18937]: i44MP1W0018935: [EMAIL PROTECTED], delay=00:00:07, xdelay=00:00:07, mailer=esmtp, pri=31065, relay=lanfill.lmi.net. [66.117.140.10], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (i44LNaYj046002 Message accepted for
delivery)
................. Sendmail is setup to only forward for "ourdomain" (not actual name) but that doesn't seem to be the issue here as that's all that's being requested. mimedefang-filter is setup to not filter messages from local private subnet machines, but, that doesn't seem to be the issue either, as in neither case is their the ...no further action necessary... in the log entries. Any ideas?
-- Thank You
Bill F.
_______________________________________________ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca MIMEDefang mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
