David F. Skoll wrote:
Yes, I thought that it was odd as well. That's why I'm reporting it.Well, that's odd. Does "clamdscan" (not "clamscan") catch it?
My original testing included both clamd and clamscan configurations in MD.
My most recent testing was with clamd disabled (so that I could narrow down any other issues in the filter).
Manually testing the sample and clamdscan DID correctly identify the virus.
What's next?
--
Albert E. Whale, CISSP - Sr. Security, Network, and Systems Consultant
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.abs-comptech.com & http://www.No-JunkMail.com ABS Computer Technology, Inc. - ESM, Computer & Networking Specialists
SPAM Zapper - www.No-JunkMail.com - SPAM Stops Here.
Founding Board of Directors of Pittsburgh FBI - InfraGard
_______________________________________________ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca MIMEDefang mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
