On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 10:01:37 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > Wouldn't this work best with a database approach similar to > greylisting? That is, store the results of your tests with a > count and timestamp so you don't have to repeat them often.
Yes, some kind of cache is probably a good idea. If I decide to use this check, I'll probably do just that. > rejects should start with > a short life but live increasingly longer as the use count > increases. That could work. But that would also mean the database has to be updated for for every incoming mail. With a static (short) lifetime for rejects the databse would only have to be updated when a check has been done for an address. Regards /Jonas -- Jonas Eckerman, [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.fsdb.org/ _______________________________________________ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca MIMEDefang mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
