Thank you, I will try that as well. We are net well versed in trouble shooting this because it has always worked flawlessly.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David F. Skoll Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 10:17 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Mimedefang] slaves On Tue, 2 Nov 2004, Button, Shawn wrote: > I bumped the 3 timeouts up to 15 minutes and it appears, just at a > cursory examination, to now have more time outs (about 8 per hour versus > about 4 per hour previously). Did you increase the multiplexor busy timeout as well? MX_BUSY in the standard startup files. > For some reason mail is still being rejected when the filter times > out...is there a way to allow the mail through instead of rejecting it > if the filter times out? We removed the F=T flag in the mc but this > didn't seem to help. It would at least buy us some time to hunt this > down more. If you hit MX_BUSY, then the mail will be tempfailed regardless of the F=T setting, because that's a policy decision made by mimedefang rather than by sendmail. Regards, David. _______________________________________________ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca MIMEDefang mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang _______________________________________________ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca MIMEDefang mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang