David + list, Just like to add my $0.02AU (I know, not very much indeed!).
I'm currently using File::Scan on three MD installations, and have not had a reported false positive, but as the majority of respondants have said, I don't monitor closely exactly _what_ is getting rejected due to virii (I don't think anybody has that much time!). I'd be interested in hearing about what it has been detecting as FP's though. I only use File::Scan on these sites for MD and mail scanning, but would not object to manually having to enable it via the $Features; however I would suggest that this is heavily faq'd and man'd, as the list will no-doubt be bombarded with questions like "I upgraded MD and File::Scan is no-longer working!", or similar! Also, I'd like to echo my appreciation for the time you put in to a marvelous product, if you are ever in the land down under (Oz), look me up, i'll buy you a beer (or two, three....) Regards, Matt > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 21:46:57 -0500 (EST) > From: "David F. Skoll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [Mimedefang] Anyone using File::Scan? > To: mimedefang@lists.roaringpenguin.com > Message-ID: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII > > Hi, > > Does anyone use File::Scan with MIMEDefang? It seems to cause a lot > of problems with false positives. > > For the next release, I'm considering removing the auto-detection > of File::Scan. In other words, if you want File::Scan, you'll have to > specifically ask for it in your filter. > > Any objections to this change? > > Regards, > > David. _______________________________________________ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca MIMEDefang mailing list MIMEDefang@lists.roaringpenguin.com http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang