Following up on myself... > (Well, OK. Some RP employees use Windoze at home, and I suppose they > might check their e-mail from home, so Clam probably is more useful > than I'm admitting... grumble grumble...)
My colleague Dave O'Neill pointed out that Clam has signatures against phishing attacks (which are platform-independent.) It blocks about six per day for us. Do any commercial AV scanners have phishing signatures? If not, that's a very strong argument for Clam. Regards, David. _______________________________________________ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca MIMEDefang mailing list MIMEDefang@lists.roaringpenguin.com http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
