On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 02:25:04 GMT, Mark wrote > Since SPF has nothing to do with PRA, especially not the "classic" > drafts, saying that Sender-ID = Caller-ID + "SPF Classic", is > somewhat of an odd statement.
The draft sent to the MARID IETF working group was simplified as such, callerID with SPF is Sender ID (basically M$ took the best parts from SPF and what they liked about Caller ID so yeah, in the strictest sense, this is not true... but in an overall sense it is). Since the MARID working group was disolved due to the patent issues with M$ (thus killing it becoming even a draft "standard" you will have to read about it elsewhere, like: http://www.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=04/08/26/1326244 The issues with the license and patents can better be read about here: http://www.apache.org/foundation/docs/sender-id-position.html Jim -- EsisNet.com Webmail Client _______________________________________________ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca MIMEDefang mailing list MIMEDefang@lists.roaringpenguin.com http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
