On 4/27/2005 16:36, James Ebright wrote: > Honestly, in your case I would use CNAMES liberally and make your MX server > the same as the PTR reverses but have customers still use the CNAME for their > MUA configurations. This will not appear any different to the end user but > will bring you into full compliance without using a CNAME for the MX record > (which is a rfc MUST NOT).
Hmm, I guess that's not too a bad idea. It'll be a weird name but definitely more correct. Now the only question is why didn't I consider that before!? Cheers, ~Jason -- _______________________________________________ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca MIMEDefang mailing list MIMEDefang@lists.roaringpenguin.com http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
