Rob MacGregor wrote: > > Right, so, you're happy that the return address is almost never the > spammer's address - that some poor innocent sod is going to be getting > these boince to them? >
Well, gee... let's think about this... ummm... /Of course not/??!! Not that i should have to explain this more, but in my testing so far, only around 3-5%% of spam (this is about 1 or two hundred a day for this particular site) is getting tagged at under 11. It's the classic spam dillemma - the site wants /all/ their email, but /no spam/, and /nothing lost/... Go figure. Again, this is just temporary, until the filter is tuned closer to what is needed... obviously, I /don't/ want to flood the net with worthless bounces... Trust me, i'm not an idiot. (I just stink at Perl!)... I just need this for a few days to finish up filter tuning... thanks again jamie _______________________________________________ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca MIMEDefang mailing list [email protected] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
