that would be nice, but i tend to run the generic scan routine (to test initially for virus) and then run the individual scanner routines based on the the result (ie if virus found, run each installed scanner directly to find out which found it and what name it was) - cumbersome, but effective as the load is only increased when viruses are found. Also, by tagging in this way, you only have to scan the individual parts when the top level found a virus (if you are doing disinfect)
Mack -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 05 November 2005 00:17 To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [Mimedefang] MIMEDefang 2.54 is Released David F. Skoll wrote: > MIMEDefang 2.54 is available at > http://www.mimedefang.org/node.php?id=1 ... > * Added experimental support for Kaspersky "kavscanner". Feature Request: could you have have the various virus detection routines record which scanner caught the virus? This would be useful for purposes of evaluating scanner performance, and it can be very helpful in diagnosing false positives. -- Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902 Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer _______________________________________________ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com MIMEDefang mailing list [email protected] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang This Email Has Been Anti-Virus Scanned _______________________________________________ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com MIMEDefang mailing list [email protected] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
