[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 12/02/2005 07:30:15 PM: > Can someone explain this to me? It's from a spam message (in fact, > a lot of them are coming through MD+SA these days) and they all show the
> same thing, negative numbers: -------- > Received: from -1216216520 ([222.60.136.228]) > by serpico.pcraft.com (8.13.0/8.13.0) with SMTP id jB30Mott008917 > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 2 Dec 2005 17:22:54 -0700 > Received: from goprat.com (-1216301840 [-1213314064]) > by ghfixtures.com (Qmailv1) with ESMTP id 8568A5A816 > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 17:22:58 -0800 -------- > Received: from 1438002568 ([84.237.176.196]) > by serpico.pcraft.com (8.13.0/8.13.0) with SMTP id jB308JGl008642 > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 2 Dec 2005 17:08:24 -0700 > Received: from gradykelly.com (1480536112 [1438170304]) > by gn7.admefres.com (Qmailv1) with ESMTP id 3E3BC79B69 > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 20:14:54 -0500 -------- I've seen Macintosh computers do this in the past (Mac OS 8.x IIRC) where they represent IP addresses as a 32bit signed integer. Could also be some ratware being stupid too. _______________________________________________ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com MIMEDefang mailing list MIMEDefang@lists.roaringpenguin.com http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
