On 19 Apr 2006 at 8:47, Adam Lanier wrote: > On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 08:20 -0400, David F. Skoll wrote: > > > So you need to do the checks in filter_sender, and filter_helo is > > essentially > > useless. > > > > Beat that dead horse, David!
To be honest, because of the fact that you can't truly reject at the "HELO" stage, plus the existence of sub-standard SMTP state machines, plus the fact that variables aren't available, I'm working on moving everything that was in filter_helo/_sender/_recipient into filter_begin at the very least (maybe "filter" itself). At that point, I will have enough info to make really informed decisions about what to do. -- Jeff Rife | | http://www.nabs.net/Cartoons/RhymesWithOrange/CatBed.jpg _______________________________________________ NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it. Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com MIMEDefang mailing list MIMEDefang@lists.roaringpenguin.com http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang