Jan Pieter Cornet wrote: > On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 02:48:42PM -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: >> Further, I believe there really is a "standard' to publish a blank >> MX record at priority 0 but I think I heard about it from Jan-Pieter >> Cornet. Anyone know if this has a real RFC or anything? > > It was described in a now-expired ietf document > draft-delany-nullmx-00.txt, still available at: > http://ietfreport.isoc.org/all-ids/draft-delany-nullmx-00.txt
How about MX 1 nomail.example.com. ? Since this does not resolve (nomail.example.com is not a valid domain, and never will be), mail being sent their should result in immediate rejection, no? -- Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902 Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer _______________________________________________ NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it. Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com MIMEDefang mailing list MIMEDefang@lists.roaringpenguin.com http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
