On Mon, 21 May 2012 12:22:39 -0700 (PDT) kd6...@yahoo.com wrote: > Definently not. A rejected message (returned to the sender) gets > more action (or administrative notice) than one accepted as spam > therefore unanswered.
Rejecting a message containing an X-Auto-Response-Suppress is not only pointless, but it violates the RFCs, which permit any sort of X-* header. Rejecting communication with Microsoft Exchange is an interesting position to take and I sympathise on a philosophical level, but it's tilting at windmills. Completely impractical if you actually rely on email for business communication. Regards, David. _______________________________________________ NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it. Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com MIMEDefang mailing list MIMEDefang@lists.roaringpenguin.com http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
