Hi! I can think of different reasons:
- not to rely on sendmail, being able to change MTA - being more flexible with specific logic in mimedefang - possibility to log sender and recipient(s), sendmail rejects clients with pre greeting traffic early in SMTP conversation Best regards Franz On 11.01.2013 21:05, wbr...@e1b.org wrote: > Franz wrote on 01/11/2013 02:49:54 PM: > >> ok, so let's rephrase the question... ;-) >> >> Is there a way to prevent SMTP slamming with mimedefang? > > Why reinvent the wheel? Sendmail does it very nicely as docummented w/ > GreetPause. What would be gained by moving it to MimeDefang? _______________________________________________ NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it. Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com MIMEDefang mailing list MIMEDefang@lists.roaringpenguin.com http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang