On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:26 AM, <wbr...@e1b.org> wrote: > >> So, is it time for mailing lists to rewrite the From: header? I've >> always preferred ones that supply a Reply-To: back to the list so >> people don't accidentally answer off-list anyway, but I know there are >> arguments on the other side. > > That seems to be the consensus on the Listserv(TM) mailing lists. They > are doing it selectively after doing a DNS Query and detecting the broken > setting. See > http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-peach.exe?A2=ind1404&L=LSTOWN-L&F=&S=&P=61953
That's ummm, interesting, that you can't see their example format without a login. But it looks like they want to rewrite the Reply-To: as the original sender which seems very wrong, at least for technical lists where most posters would never want to request a private reply. And doing anything 'selectively' also seems wrong if you ever expect users to catch on to how a system works. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com _______________________________________________ NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it. Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com MIMEDefang mailing list MIMEDefang@lists.roaringpenguin.com http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang