On Aug 11, 2015, at 9:06 PM, Dianne Skoll <d...@roaringpenguin.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 16:24:25 -0600
> Philip Prindeville <philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com> wrote:
> 
>> You'll take a patch?
> 
> Possibly, but I think I've made my feelings pretty clear, that filter_helo
> is not really something I like in MIMEDefang.  I'd prefer to remove it,
> to be honest.  But yes, if you send a patch I'll consider it.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Dianne.


Well, no one has to use filter_helo() that doesn’t want to.

We do and I love it.  We see a lot of machines saying “HELO friend”, “HELO 
localhost”, “HELO localhost.localdomain”, “HELO 66.232.79.143”, “HELO 
[66.232.79.143]”, “HELO 192.168.2.33”, etc and it’s handy to tempfail these 
hosts so that they keep trying and waste their own resources.

Anyway, here’s the patch.  I added the parameter to both filter_helo() and 
filter_relay() since TLS can be present for either stage.  For instance, in 
Sendmail:

O DaemonPortOptions=Port=465, Name=MSA, Family=inet, M=Es

i.e. the ’s’ modifier in the list of ‘Modifier’ (M) parameters telling Sendmail 
to speak SSL over this socket (v8.13 and later).


Attachment: mimedefang-2.78-tlsversion.patch
Description: Binary data


_______________________________________________
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above
message, it is NULL AND VOID.  You may ignore it.

Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com
MIMEDefang mailing list MIMEDefang@lists.roaringpenguin.com
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang

Reply via email to