Hi!

We use last mimedefang-2.79 and postfix-3.1.4 and have problem with definition 
of $QueueID vars in filter_begin. 

For example case 1, when we have more than one rcpt to in SMTP session:

May 24 12:20:29 mailsrv1 postfix/cleanup[89515]: 3B8F0286AE8: 
message-id=<df2a0a267c834f168cd822df171641cd@XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX>
May 24 12:20:29 mailsrv1 mimedefang-multiplexor[84421]: 3B8F0286AE8: copymail: 
connect=inbound message-id=<df2a0a267c834f168cd822df171641cd@XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX> 
queue_id=3B8F0286AE8

May 24 12:20:30 mailsrv1 postfix/cleanup[89515]: 282FD2869A1: 
message-id=<df2a0a267c834f168cd822df171641cd@XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX>
May 24 12:20:30 mailsrv1 mimedefang-multiplexor[84421]: copymail: 
connect=inbound message-id=<df2a0a267c834f168cd822df171641cd@XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX> 
queue_id=NOQUEUE

Sometimes mimedefang can't define  $QueueID for one recipient:

May 25 10:25:29 mailsrv1 postfix/cleanup[72878]: 748F1177F89B: 
message-id=<c9fb40cb9746328ec2a30728a.698f77fc2c.20170525072031.e8d687df58.cb460...@mail28.atl71.mcdlv.net>
May 25 10:25:29 mailsrv1 mimedefang-multiplexor[51288]: copymail: 
connect=inbound 
message-id=<c9fb40cb9746328ec2a30728a.698f77fc2c.20170525072031.e8d687df58.cb460...@mail28.atl71.mcdlv.net>
 queue_id=NOQUEUE

Usually all work fine. It is the known problem or we not correctly use 
mimedefang? If it is required, I'm ready to get and provide detailed log data.
We found similar discussion about this problem in postfix maillist:
http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/Queue-ID-availability-for-milters-on-multi-message-connections-sessions-td89741.html

Thanks!
_______________________________________________
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above
message, it is NULL AND VOID.  You may ignore it.

Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com
MIMEDefang mailing list MIMEDefang@lists.roaringpenguin.com
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang

Reply via email to