On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 23:35:54 +0200 Marcus Schopen <[email protected]> wrote:
> That might me right in most of the cases. But if you do a "silent" > reject, this has to be communicated very clearly to the recipient, as > well as rejecting at a spamassassin score of >= 5. This is nothing you > can decide on your own as postmaster, just because it makes sense. It's not silent. The sender will get a delivery failure notification. [...] > I agree that most detected virus mails (I use clamav) are virus mails. > But I myself got some valid emails from Amazon, which were marked as > "Heuristics.Phishing.Email.SpoofedDomain" and therefore those emails > were rejected. Ah, well. Don't use those dangerous signatures. Were those official ClamAV signatures or third-party signatures? Also, I'd check the virus name and maybe quarantine rather than bounce on "Heuristics" hits. Regards, Dianne. _______________________________________________ NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it. Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com MIMEDefang mailing list [email protected] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
