On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 10:52 PM, Wolfgang Glas <wolfgang.g...@ev-i.at> wrote: > Ozkan Sezer schrieb: >> On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 8:46 PM, Wolfgang Glas <wolfgang.g...@ev-i.at> wrote: >>> Ozkan Sezer schrieb: >>>> To anyone who might be interested: I updated my >>>> custom w64 cross-compiler build with gcc-4.4.3 with >>>> many backports / fixes from mainstream and uploaded >>>> to uhexen2 support files section. >>>> >>>> Versions: >>>> >>>> binutils : 2.20.51 (cvs, 2009-10-31 18:35 GMT) >>>> mingw-w64-crt : svn revision 1505 (2009-10-26) >>>> mingw-w64-headers : svn revision 1509 (2009-10-31) >>>> gcc : svn revision 153794 (4.4.3 prerelease with patches) >>> Hi Ozkan, >>> >>> Could you please post the patches against gcc-4.4-branch either to this >>> list >>> or on a website? A short comment on each patch would be appreciated very >>> much. >>> >> >> See the source tarball under Toolchain sources -> Personal Builds. >> Most, if not all, of the binaries also contain the used patches under >> a subdirectory called _build_info within themselves. > > Oh, TX, I'll hava a look at these. >
Mostly PR patches that went into 4.5 but not planned for a 4.4 backport. >>> Moreover, is there a reason, why you are using a gcc-4.4.3 prerelease >>> rather >>> than the official gcc-4.4.2 release? >> >> Well, 4.4.3 contain more fixes and, as far as I can follow, >> there aren't any regressions since 4.4.2. > > Good point, ThX. My reason is the same as yours when you asking about a 4.4.2 based release whereas you already report that you are perfectly fine with 4.4.1 based releases. You see that 4.4.2 out you feel the urge to upgrade. For me, well I feel that urge a little earlier ;) > >>> The reason behind my questions is, that I'd like to upgrade my ubuntu >>> packages >>> from mingw-w64-gcc-4.4.1-1 to gcc-4.4.2. We've made excellent experience >>> with >>> our mingw-w64-gcc-4.4.1-1 packages, so I'm not in a hurry ;-) >> >> Really good to hear that you have success with us. >> I'm fairly sure that there will be official 4.4.2-based >> packages from our packagers, too. > > Everytime the same story: No feedback for developers, if everything is working > OK ;-) > > We have ported multihreaded server-applications (omniORB-4.1.4 based) as well > as > multithreaded GUI-Programs (Qt3 and Qt4) from mingw.org to mingw-w64 cross > compilers and observed no regression yet ;-) We really need some web space (a wiki maybe?) for such success stories. Out of curiosity, are your successes with x86 or x86_64 or both? > > And, yes, the ported programs are non-trivial in many ways, the server > application is an image-rendering engine behind a JAVA-webapp, which is under > heavy use by 1500 users. > > So, that's why I wonder how you mange to further increase mingw-w64's > stability ;->> > > Wolfgang > -- Ozkan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
