Hi Ruben!

On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Ruben Van Boxem
<[email protected]> wrote:
> 2011/9/19 K. Frank <[email protected]>
>> ...
>> I'm certainly not trying to put you on the spot
>> with exaggerated claims.  (And for everyone's information, Ruben will
>> be releasing a c++22-compliant personal build next week.)
>
> I'm sure you mean C++11 :)... And FYI, it's already there, linked above ;-)
> there's just some minor things making it experimental. That "next week"
> thing is about three weeks old, when I uploaded my first experimental
> stdthread build.

Sorry, dumb joke.  (I was making the exaggerated claim on your behalf
that you would be releasing next week a preview version of the *next*
new upcoming c++ standard to be finalized eleven years hence, in 2022.)

>> By the way, could you give me a brief explanation of the implications
>> of using "-static"?  What do I lose; what do I gain?  Would I have to
>> modify my code to use it?
>
> The most important one is that you need libgcc dll to throw exceptions
> across dll boundaries. Due to everything being linked into the final
> executable, it'll be larger. Other than that, I'm not really sure what the
> realworld drawbacks are.

Thanks for the explanation.

> ...
>> > Why not use portable boost:: thread in the meantime?
>> ...
>> Nothing against boost -- just a different goal.
>
> I was actually suggesting something to the other guy (veegee/venu I think),
> who was asking about a cross-platform threading abstraction.

Got it.  No problem.

> Ruben

Best.


K. Frank

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1
_______________________________________________
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public

Reply via email to