2013/9/27 LRN <[email protected]>: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 27.09.2013 02:20, Kai Tietz wrote: >> Sure, this library seems to be missed. >> >> Please provide a patch, which just adds the missing files, and doesn't >> touch other lines without need (whitespace changes?). > AFAICS, the patch that was sent to the ML is rather minimalistic. It > only adds one missing line to Makefile.am > However, regenerating Makefile.in with this patch produces somewhat > larger diff. > I don't see a point in hand-crafting Makefile.in changes, since sooner > or later you'll have to re-generate it, and all the diffs that you've > kept back by changing Makefile.in manually would come back in one giant, > unreadable diff.
Sure, nevertheless I am curious why identical lines getting displayed there as diff. In general this indicates some issues about \r\n translation, which might get easily a serious point. Patch itself is ok. Kai ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60133471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
