2013/12/4 K. Frank <kfrank2...@gmail.com>
> Hello Wynfield!
>
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 8:56 AM, <wynfi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
> >
> > It's been a while and I'm a confused over which Mingw is which.
>
> Mingw (www.mingw.org) and mingw-w64 (mingw-w64.sourceforge.net)
> are two different projects with two different mailing lists
> (mingw-us...@lists.sourceforge.net and
> mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net,
> respectively).
>
> > I preferring a manual install downloaded the files stated as needed for
> a minimal system plus the gbd and document packages from:
> > URL = http://http://www.mingw.org//wiki/InstallationHOWTOforMinGW
>
> I think the current set-ups are such that it is easier to carry out a
> purely manual install process with mingw-w64.
>
There have been installers for the mingw-builds (which are MinGW-w64 based)
since quite some time:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingwbuilds/files/mingw-builds-install/mingw-builds-install.exe
>
> > Then I recalled reading somewhere, back when, that there is also a
> different Mingw. Also I note that there is also a Mingw64 which I assume
> will only run on 64 bit machines, but could be ran or a 32 bit to build 64
> bit program?
>
> If I remember correctly, mingw-w64 provides both 32-bit and 64-bit
> toolchains, while I think that mingw only provides the 32-bit version.
> (Hopefully some one will chime in if I have this wrong). I do believe
> that mingw is planning a future 64-bit version.
>
Right, let's hope they never decide to double that effort and instead
adsolve into MinGW-w64.
>
> > If there are multiple flavors of Mingw and different x-bit packages I
> would like to know which is which, what is different.
>
> Again, two separate projects with two separate web sites and two
> separate mailing lists. (This is the mingw-w64 mailing list.)
>
> Both compilers work -- I can't really say which would be better
> suited to your purposes.
>
DISCLAIMER: the below opinion is based on the facts presented alongside
said opinion, and is in no way related to the opinions of any MinGW-w64
developer, although I know they wouldn't mind me promoting their work ;-)
Seeing that MinGW-w64 has taken the place of the old MinGW.org stuff in
pretty much any self-respecting distribution (I cite OpenSUSE, Fedora,
Debian, Ubuntu, and Arch because those are just the ones I know about), and
various open source projects have embraced MinGW-w64 (Qt comes to mind), I
think you'll be better off in the long run to choose MinGW-w64.
Cheers,
Ruben
> > Thank you.
>
> Good luck., and ...
>
>
> Happy Mingw/w64 Hacking!
>
>
> K. Frank
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Sponsored by Intel(R) XDK
> Develop, test and display web and hybrid apps with a single code base.
> Download it for free now!
>
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=111408631&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> Mingw-w64-public mailing list
> Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsored by Intel(R) XDK
Develop, test and display web and hybrid apps with a single code base.
Download it for free now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=111408631&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
