On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Dongsheng Song
<dongsheng.s...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 7:33 PM, Jacek Caban <ja...@codeweavers.com> wrote:
>> Hi Alexey,
>>
>> On 01/07/15 09:06, Alexey Pavlov wrote:
>>> Ladt changes to time functions lead to multiple definitions of
>>> "asctime_r" in some programs. For example,
>>
>> I just pushed a fixup:
>> http://sourceforge.net/p/mingw-w64/mingw-w64/ci/9f52135b2fa1336d63cda12c502f1790797387fa
>>
>> I wonder why it didn't cause errors in my case...
>>
>
> Thanks. It cause gcc build failure because more than one source file
> include time.h, then asctime_r got implemented more than once.

Ditto, fixes problems on MSYS2. Alexey, can you re-package
mingw-w64-headers as this problem will hit a lot of people very soon
otherwise.

>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming! The Go Parallel Website,
> sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your
> hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought
> leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a
> look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net
> _______________________________________________
> Mingw-w64-public mailing list
> Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming! The Go Parallel Website,
sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your
hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought
leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a
look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net
_______________________________________________
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public

Reply via email to