Martell Malone schreef op do 29-01-2015 om 15:23 [+0000]: > This change makes sense. Right now Eric is checking this > change on > Fedora. So we should wait for his results. > Yes but I think he should also build on rc1 without the patch to make > sure that if there is a breakage this is the cause.
I'm currently doing a mass rebuild test run with mingw-w64 v4.0rc1 including the patch mentioned in this thread. It takes around 24hours to prepare and complete such a test mass rebuild. I wasn't really planning on also doing a test mass rebuild with plain v4.0rc1 (without the patch). However, I do was planning to introduce GCC 5 in Fedora soon (the native gcc in Fedora was also just updated to the latest GCC 5 snapshot) and use this to do another test mass rebuild. Regards, Erik ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
