-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 10/19/2016 07:23, David Wohlferd wrote:
> On 10/18/2016 3:28 PM, JonY wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
>>
>> On 10/19/2016 04:18, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
>>> On 18 Oct, David Wohlferd wrote :
>>>> Is there an official list of release criteria for mingw-w64
>>>> v5? Or a targeted release date? I'm not seeing anything on
>>>> the web site.
>>> It would be nice to have a release, indeed.
>>>
>>> Btw, there is still the MACRO bug about IN6_IS_ADDR_MULTICAST,
>>> in violation of the POSIX spec, and I'd love to get that fixed
>>> before we do the 5.0 release.
>>>
>> It's just been released, but I have not yet announce it, I guess
>> that can go into 5.0.1.
>
> Wow. That was... abrupt. I didn't even know it was being
> considered.
>
> Was the cutoff before or after that big checkin I just did to
> upgrade the make files? From one point of view, I'm hoping it was
> included. On the other hand, I would never have pushed this had I
> known we were just days away from a release.
>
You're right it was kind of abrupt, but RC has been out forever
without much feedback.
The regenerated auto* changes were not included, but I did include
some recent code fixes.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iF4EAREIAAYFAlgHRIsACgkQk721PNTrx0CAJQEAhCDeMBzWNmhoaPQfixKYscW3
Cc9KRXiVUlz7znrYFXcA/28E1s+baMk2/2p21UYejDL+K2oioFw8IJ6FrrKb/8om
=jKrZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
