On 12/22/2016 11:52 AM, David Wohlferd wrote: > On 12/21/2016 4:27 AM, JonY wrote: >> On 12/21/2016 07:29 AM, David Wohlferd wrote: >>> Comments? Zidane, can you try this? >> David, can you also test against the gfortran testsuites? > > Since mingw-w64 doesn't have any gfortran testsuites, I assume you want > me to run gcc's. Running "make -k check-fortran"before applying my fix > shows a BUNCH of failures. Since I know squat about fortran, I'm not > sure if this is because my environment is set up wrong, or if there are > normally this many errors. My gcc source is also somewhat old. > >> Kai asks to make sure there are no new failures introduced by this change. > > I suppose the most significant metric is how many failures are added (or > removed) by applying my patch. It turns out, the number of failures is > unchanged: > > === gfortran Summary === > > # of expected passes 42031 > # of unexpected failures 788 > # of expected failures 80 > # of unsupported tests 180 > > Logfile available upon request. > >> Thanks for looking into it. > > What's next?
OK, clear to apply to master, thanks for testing!
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms. With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE. Training and support from Colfax. Order your platform today.http://sdm.link/intel
_______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
