Hi David, On 17.02.2017 16:49, David Grayson wrote: > If the compiler has a builtin for the intrinsic, why would mingw-w64 > still provide a prototype for it? It seems like it would have no > benefit and be likely to just cause compiler errors in the future.
That's how intrinsics work in MSVC, their prototypes are still declared in headers. Given that clang tries to match MSVC as closely as possible, I think we should do the same in our headers. Thanks, Jacek ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
