W dniu 2017-05-17 o 13:10, Kai Tietz pisze: > Hello, > > I dislike such a change. As if somebody wants to driverspec.h, op > will need these symbols defined. Otherwise build will badly fail. > So this brings us back to the reasoning of this ... adding to > specstrings.h the include of driverspecs.h. IMHO this shouldn't be > done always. The best solution would be something like to include > driverspecs.h in specstring.h only, if user intends to use ddk. > Otherwise we shouldn't include this header at all. > > Any thoughts? > > Regards, > Kai
We could roll back commit [b7f44b]. Now there are new commits and this should be fixed. Mateusz > > > 2017-05-17 12:34 GMT+02:00 Mateusz <mateu...@poczta.onet.pl>: >> We really should do something with '__in' and '__out' from driverspecs.h. >> >> Please review. >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most >> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot >> _______________________________________________ >> Mingw-w64-public mailing list >> Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Mingw-w64-public mailing list > Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
