Thanks. > why unnamed union in other header file does not show that error?
Presumably because other unnamed unions only introduce unnamed structs. I.e. the other way to fix it could be removing _LBA and _MSF type names and marking the corresponding structs as anonymous. -- Best regards, Alex On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 at 11:01, Biswapriyo Nath <nathbap...@gmail.com> wrote: > Patch file updated. Though I would like to know why unnamed union in other > header file does not show that error? Both __C89_NAMELESS and > _ANONYMOUS_UNION are defined to __extension__. > _______________________________________________ > Mingw-w64-public mailing list > Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public > _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
