Thanks! Am Fr., 14. Okt. 2022 um 15:24 Uhr schrieb Martin Storsjö <mar...@martin.st>: > > On Fri, 14 Oct 2022, Kai Tietz wrote: > > > Yes, look good to me. Wouldn't it make sense to add __mingww64_stpcpy > > function, so we could provide this function in an more compatible way? > > I don't see the direct need for it; mingw-w64 doesn't have it general, and > this status quo works for most projects (if they use it, they probe for > its existence and provide a replacement), so I don't see the potential > gain from optionally providing it. This seemed to be the general consensus > in https://github.com/msys2/MINGW-packages/issues/5803 too, FWIW. > > // Martin >
_______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
