On 05/10/2013 10:03 AM, Erik van Pienbroek wrote: > In my opinion I would always place executables from group 1 in the main > package (mingw32-foo/mingw64-foo). Generally I would also place > executables from group 2 in the main package.
I agree. > Native executables (group 3) must always be bundled in a separate > package because they are arch-specific (while packages containing mingw > binaries are noarch). > > I'm not sure what to do with executables from group 4.. Group 4 should also go into the main package. The use of sub-packages with MinGW packages is different than native packages. With MinGW we are providing a development environment only (think -devel). The use of sub-packages should be limited to restrict dependency chains. It could be argued that the current "mingw-qt-tools" package should merge with the main one. It is the only package that has a "-tools" sub-package. Michael _______________________________________________ mingw mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
