re: minikanren + triple store + on-disk persistence I did benchmarks on trivial queries over a dataset that is smaller than memory. The results were disappointing, minikanren queries were around 100 times slower than the equivalent query using only SRFI-168 <https://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-168/> primitives (which are 2 to 3 times faster than a Java-based triple store using Chez Scheme).
Anyway, SRFI-168 is still a work-in-progress don't hesitate to chime in. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "minikanren" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/minikanren. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/minikanren/d94f8ec8-8983-4cef-943d-cbe79ee98157%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
