Thank you for the help. I am not sure if the change is necessary as long as what is implemented now works everything should be fine. Especially, taking into account that the definition happens only once and the usage semantics does not change and is very convenient.
However, the problem described in my next posted topic still persists. Also now I get the following error when calling ]]* a[[ b[[ ]]* bigforth: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libgsl.so.0: undefined symbol: cblas_dgemm As you know I do: library libgslcblas libgslcblas.so library libgsl libgsl.so.0 depends libgslcblas which should have satisfied the dependancy because symbol cblas_dgemm is defined in libgslcblas.so May be I am no defining something what I should? Do you know how to correct it? Thanks a lot for the help! On Sat, 17 Sep 2005 14:53:16 +0200 Bernd Paysan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Maybe I'll change bigFORTH's declaration to be more > intuitive in future, too, but ATM, this way is much easier to > implement (each declaration element just is a macro that takes one > item from the Forth stack and pushes it on the C stack). --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
